Kevin Karhan :verified:<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://infosec.space/@fennix" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>fennix</span></a></span> TBH, I think those bs claims should be illegal.</p><p>The only valid claims I've seen is that it enables people to circumvent <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/geoblocking" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>geoblocking</span></a> and potentially <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/InternetCensorship" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>InternetCensorship</span></a> as well as <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/TrafficDiscrimination" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>TrafficDiscrimination</span></a> due to lack of <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/NetNeutrality" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>NetNeutrality</span></a>, but those are always to be taken with a truckload of salt!</p><p>Most certsinly, there are no <em>"<a href="https://infosec.space/tags/loglessVPN" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>loglessVPN</span></a>|s"</em> and no <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/VPN" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>VPN</span></a> provider will <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20210606070919/twitter.com/thegrugq/status/1085614812581715968" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">risk jailtime for any.client</a>…</p>